Christy M. v. Hunter M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we “presum[e] ‘that district judges know the law,’ especially when it comes to clear rules in the area of criminal sentencing” (citation omitted)
• noting that this court presumes “that district judges know the law, especially when it comes to clear rules in the area of criminal sentencing” (quotations and citation omitted)
• noting that a non-harmless error in calculating a defendant’s guidelines range requires resentencing
• assuming without deciding that considering § 3553(a)(2)(A) factors at revocation sentencing constitutes procedural error
• reviewing an identical argument for plain error because it was never raised below
• “Unquestionably, the commission of acts sufficient to support a conviction . . . satisf[ies] the requisite misconduct to warrant revocation of supervised release.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).