· 3/12/1925
Christopoulos v. Contos
Citations
- 4 F.2d 560
- 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 957
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the Back Pay Act “undisputedly was designed to deal directly with employee working conditions”
- explaining that the Back Pay Act “undisputedly was designed to deal directly with employee working conditions”
- \[A] claim that the arbitration or FLRA procedures were unconstitutional would have to be brought as a collateral challenge in the district court[.]\
- “[A] claim that the arbitration or FLRA procedures were unconstitutional would have to be brought as a collateral challenge in the district court[.]”
- “[A] claim that the arbitration or FLRA procedures were unconstitutional would have to be brought as a collateral challenge in the district court[.]”
- “[A] claim that the arbitration or FLRA procedures were unconstitutional would have to be brought as a collateral challenge in the district court[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.