Christopher Village, Ltd. Partnership v. Retsinas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that once the Federal National Mortgage Association assigned the note to HUD, HUD “had the same remedial rights as the original lender”
• holding a foreclosure sale “effectively moot[s]” a plaintiff’s request “for an injunction ... because of th[e] court’s inability to fashion adequate relief”
• holding that, “[a]lthough the injunction and mandamus requests are moot, Village’s request for a declaratory judgment continues to present a live dispute,” because it could “use [a] declaration as a predicate for a damages action against HUD in the Court of Federal Claims”
• “a court’s refusal to review HUD rent decisions does not necessarily obtain when HUD [allegedly] ignores ‘a plain statutory duty, exceed[s] its jurisdiction, or commit[s] constitutional error.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).