Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Balt. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• endorsing the same reasoning in the context of parallel First Amendment and equal protection claims
• endorsing the same reasoning in the context of parallel First Amendment and equal protection claims
• endorsing the same reasoning in the context of parallel First Amendment and equal protection claims
• affirming dismissal where “the same considerations and evidence that defeat [the plaintiff’s] First Amendment claim cause the same claim repackaged under the Equal Protection Clause to fail”
• first citing Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507, 516 (1980); then citing Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 372 (1976)
• “[T]he claim must fail because the same considerations and evidence that defeat her First Amendment claim cause the same claim repackaged under the Equal Protection Clause to fail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).