Christopher v. Kendavis Holding Co. (In Re Kendavis Holding Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that although formal requirements of notice are not required for postpetition claims, constitutionally adequate notice is still required
• concluding that although formal requirements of notice are not required for postpetition claims, constitutionally adequate notice is still required
• stating, “A potential litigant who knows about a legal proceeding usually has adequate notice that his rights could be jeopardized and should take steps to protect his rights.”
• stating, \A potential litigant who knows about a legal proceeding usually has adequate notice that his rights could be jeopardized and should take steps to protect his rights\
• due process requires that a debtor “refrain from assuring potential claimants that their rights will not be adversely affected during bankruptcy proceedings”
• due process requires that a debtor refrain from assuring potential claimants that their rights will not be adversely affected during bankruptcy proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).