Skip to main content
· 9/18/2006

Christopher Skinner v. A. Peter Govorchin

Citations

  • 463 F.3d 518
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23678
  • 2006 WL 2661092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[the plaintiff’s] complaint regarding [the defendant’s] denial of [his] grievance appeal, it is clear, fails to state a claim”
  • explaining that, since Imbler, prosecutorial immunity extends to any activities in connection with a prosecutor’s duties (citation omitted)
  • stating that absolute prosecutorial immunity “also extends beyond the criminal process to conduct in civil proceedings where a government attorney is operating in an enforcement role in ‘initiating . . . judicial proceedings’”
  • addressing a prisoner’s claim that state’s collection of PLRA costs was violative of § 1915(b)(2)
  • applying absolute immunity to prosecution to recover civil costs, an “enforcement role in initiating judicial proceedings”
  • “Skinner’s complaint regarding Wolfenbarger’s denial of Skinner’s grievance appeal, it is clear, fails to state a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Sutton, Wiseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.