Christopher Scott Brann v. Carlos Guimaraes and Jemima Guimaraes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court may not effect statutory provisions that are inseparable from unconstitutional statutory provisions
• stating that a court may not effect legal statutory provisions that are inseparable from illegal provisions
• determining that a statute conveying title to 15/l 6 of all minerals in public school lands to the owner of the soil violated article VII, section 4
• “The rule is also well settled that legislative grants of property, rights, or privileges must be construed strictly in favor of the state on grounds of public policy, and whatever is not unequivocally granted in clear and explicit terms is withheld.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).