Skip to main content
· 8/12/2004

Christopher S. Hall v. Allen Bennett and Stan Russell

Citations

  • 379 F.3d 462
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16609
  • 2004 WL 1795087

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating grant of summary judgment for defendants who forced inmate to strip electrical wire without protective gloves
  • reversing summary judgment for prison officials who failed to provide electrical gloves to prisoner performing work as electrician
  • claim of deliberate indifference where individual not trained as an electrician was ordered to work on a live circuit without protective gloves and was electrocuted
  • “[A] jury could infer from the electrical safety code mandating the use of protective gloves when cutting into the insulation on live wires that the defendants knew pliers alone would not protect Hall from the risk of electrocution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.