Skip to main content
· 8/1/2017

Christopher Ryan Peek v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that district courts “may consider relevant uncharged or even acquitted criminal conduct in sentencing” so long as the court finds that conduct is supported by the “preponderance of the evidence” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.