Christopher Maurice Daniels v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that rainfall constituted an act of God because it was not “of extraordinary character”
• “Heavy rainfalls, unless they are unusual and extraordinary, are not considered acts of God.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).