Skip to main content
· 9/13/1971

Christopher Martella v. Marine Cooks & Stewards Union, Seafarers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio

Citations

  • 448 F.2d 729
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 863
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying Rule 60 motion due to “lack of 2 diligence and attention to the matter”
  • \Insufficient showings for relief [under Rule 60(b)(1)] ... include when the party or attorney did not act diligently\
  • “Insufficient showings for relief [under Rule 60(b)(1) ].... include when the party or attorney did not act diligently”
  • “60(b) motions are addressed to the sound discretion of the district court.” (internal citation omitted)
  • ‘Insufficient showings for relief [under Rule 60(b)(1)] ... include when the party or attorney did not act diligently’
  • “In order to bring himself within the limited area of Rule 60(b)(6) a petitioner is required to establish the existence of extraordinary circumstances which prevented or rendered him unable to prosecute an appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koelsch, Duniway, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.