· 9/13/1971
Christopher Martella v. Marine Cooks & Stewards Union, Seafarers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio
Citations
- 448 F.2d 729
- 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 863
- 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying Rule 60 motion due to “lack of 2 diligence and attention to the matter”
- \Insufficient showings for relief [under Rule 60(b)(1)] ... include when the party or attorney did not act diligently\
- “Insufficient showings for relief [under Rule 60(b)(1) ].... include when the party or attorney did not act diligently”
- “60(b) motions are addressed to the sound discretion of the district court.” (internal citation omitted)
- ‘Insufficient showings for relief [under Rule 60(b)(1)] ... include when the party or attorney did not act diligently’
- “In order to bring himself within the limited area of Rule 60(b)(6) a petitioner is required to establish the existence of extraordinary circumstances which prevented or rendered him unable to prosecute an appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koelsch, Duniway, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.