Christopher M. Opsteen v. Keller Structures, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a person who applied for disability benefits must live with the factual representations made to obtain them, and if these show inability to do the job then an ADA claim may be rejected without further inquiry”
• “Litigants who take one view of the facts, and prevail, are equitably estopped to assert the opposite later.”
• contradictions between applications for ERISA benefits and ADA claims are no more acceptable than those between SSDI applications and ADA claims
• “Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems, Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).