Christopher Lapointe, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there is a substantial public interest in protecting people from telephone harassment
• interpreting the harassment statute as content-neutral where a person must, with the intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another and without the intent of legitimate communication, “make[] a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues” I.C. §35-45-2-2(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).