Christopher Kolupa v. Roselle Park District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a religious discrimination plaintiff need only say that the employer “h[eld] the worker’s religion against him”
• holding that a religious discrimination plaintiff need only say that the employer “h[eld] the worker’s religion against him”
• noting that a complaint would satisfy Rule 8(a) if it alleged that an “employer . . . caused some concrete injury by holding the worker’s religion against him”
• stating that \complaints need not plead facts\
• stating that “com- plaints need not plead facts”
• “[CJomplaints need not plead facts and need not narrate events that correspond to each aspect of the applicable legal rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).