Christopher Joe Bradshaw, Sr. v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a case is only fully litigated if it has opportunity to be “reviewed by [a circuit court] and the Supreme Court.”
• holding that a case is only fully litigated if it has opportunity to be “reviewed by [a circuit court] and the Supreme Court.”
• holding that court did not abuse its discretion in 19 granting a TRO in favor of Shell even though it recognized that environmental organizations like 20 Greenpeace help hold oil and gas companied accountable and there is a public interest in a 21 healthy environment
• describing serious questions going to the merits as “a lesser showing than 4 likelihood of success on the merits”
• describing serious questions going to the merits as “a lesser showing than 13 likelihood of success on the merits”
• quotingAlliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1135 (9th Cir. 2011)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).