Christopher J. Foster, Inc. v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting Hirsch v. duPont, 553 F.2d 750 (2d Cir. 1977), to its facts
• cause of action would not he unless the misstatement was “expressed directly, with knowledge or notice that it [would] be acted upon” by the plaintiffs
• “[I]ndeed some cases have imposed liability in situations in which plaintiff could have determined the truth with relatively modest investigation.”
• “Decisions holding that reliance on misrepresentations was not justified are generally cases in which plaintiff was placed on guard or practically faced with the facts.”
• \Decisions holding that reliance on misrepresentations was not justified are generally cases in which plaintiff was placed on guard or practically faced with the facts.\
• “[I]ndeed some cases have imposed liability in situations in which plaintiff could have determined the truth with relatively modest investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).