Skip to main content
· 4/1/2016

Christopher Hunter v. State

Citations

  • 187 So. 3d 1265
  • 2016 WL 1260907
  • 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendant’s statement “I don’t want to talk, man” was ambiguous because of an immediate subsequent statement “I mean” was meant to explain the previous statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger, Torpy, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.