Christopher Holly v. D. Woolfolk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “being placed in segregation is too trivial an incremental deprivation of a (continued...
• noting that “being placed in segregation [for two days] is too trivial an incremental deprivation of a convicted prisoner's liberty to trigger the duty of due process”
• hearing for detainee within 48 hours of placement in segregation did not violate due process; hearing need not take place prior to imposition of punishment
• “[TJhere is no required minimum amount in controversy in a federal civil rights suit.”
• relying on Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 473–74 (1983)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).