Christopher Gray Wallace v. Jessica Tomlin Wallace
Syllabus
Husband and Wife divorced the trial court divided their property. Husband appeals, asserting five errors. Two of those purported errors are related to continuances, and three are related to the trial court's division of the couple's property. With regard the property division, one purported error relates to the trial court's division of certain vehicles and two purported errors relate to the trial court's division of two parcels of real property. We conclude that both of Husband's continuance arguments are waived. We also conclude that his property division argument as to the vehicles is waived. With regard to the real property division, we conclude the trial court made inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law to explain its decision as to both parcels, and we vacate and remand for the trial court to render further findings of fact and conclusions of law.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a school district violated the First Amendment rights of a plaintiff when 16 it suspended her for creating a private social media profile mocking the school principal and containing adult and explicit content
- declining to defer to the school's conclusion as to potential for substantial disruption where the facts did not support a reasonable forecast of substantial disruption
- “Neither the Supreme Court nor this Court has ever allowed schools to punish students for off-campus speech that is not school-sponsored or at a school-sponsored event and that caused no substantial disruption at school. We follow the logic and letter of these cases . . . ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.