Christopher Eugene Brooks v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a Supreme Court decision “postdate[d] the state-court decision in this case, and therefore could not . . . be the basis to reverse the state court’s decision”
• “Claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel are governed by the same standards applied to trial counsel under Strickland.”
• \Claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel are governed by the same standards applied to 7 trial counsel under Strickland.\
• \Claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel are governed by the same standards applied to trial counsel under Strickland\
• internal quotation marks 8 Case: 17-13998 Date Filed: 04/10/2019 Page: 9 of 12 omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).