Seventh Circuit· 11/10/2011
Christopher Brown v. John Calamos
Citations
- 664 F.3d 123
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22653
- 2011 WL 5505375
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing amendments to a complaint after a defendant has moved to dismiss under SLU-SA
- discussing amendments to a complaint after a defendant has moved to dismiss under SLUSA
- criticizing “cases that allow dismissal of a case barred by SLUSA without prejudice”
- court addressed whether the plaintiff's complaint alleged a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security
- SLUSA “prohib- its securities class actions if the class has more than 50 mem- bers”
- “But when SLUSA is a bar, it operates as an affirmative defense, which is a defense on the merits, not a jurisdictional defense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Posner, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Appert v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2012-03-08· cited 94×
- United States v. Timothy DurhamSeventh Circuit· 2014-09-04· cited 68×
- William Hampton v. Pacific Investment ManagementNinth Circuit· 2017-08-24· cited 60×
- Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Second Circuit· 2020-10-29· cited 43×
- Patricia Holtz v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Seventh Circuit· 2017-01-23· cited 26×
- Stephens v. GentilelloD. New Jersey· 2012-02-14· cited 22×
- Margaret Richek Goldberg v. Bank of America, N.A.Seventh Circuit· 2017-01-23· cited 17×
- Northstar Financial Advisors v. Schwab InvestmentsNinth Circuit· 2018-09-14· cited 17×
- Susan Nielen-Thomas v. Concorde Investment ServicesSeventh Circuit· 2019-01-24· cited 16×
- Irene Dixon v. Ladish Company IncorSeventh Circuit· 2012-01-26· cited 10×
- Rayner v. ETrade Fin. Corp.Second Circuit· 2018-07-31· cited 9×
- Tellabs Operations, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.N.D. Illinois· 2012-08-29· cited 3×
- Portell v. ZayedE.D. Illinois· 2019-03-21· cited 2×
- Jorling v. Anthem, Inc.S.D. Indiana· 2011-12-23· cited 1×
- Rayner v. ETRADE Financial Corp.Second Circuit· 2018-07-31
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-02-09· cited 877×
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-03-27· cited 664×
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court· 2006-03-21· cited 550×
- Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2004-04-02· cited 479×
- United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 478×
- Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware· 2004-03-31· cited 368×
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware· 1981-05-13· cited 335×
- Kircher v. Putnam Funds TrustSupreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 305×
- Atkins v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2011-01-25· cited 281×
- Schock v. NashSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-06-16· cited 127×
- Ryan v. GiffordCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2007-11-21· cited 110×
- Ryan Rowinski, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., Ryan RowinskiThird Circuit· 2005-02-16· cited 98×
- Charles H. Behlen v. Merrill LynchEleventh Circuit· 2002-11-08· cited 80×
- Sample v. MorganCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2007-01-23· cited 69×
- In Re Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Seventh Circuit· 2010-05-19· cited 66×
- Segal v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A.Sixth Circuit· 2009-09-17· cited 61×
- Turek v. General Mills, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2011-10-17· cited 57×
- LaSala v. Bordier Et CieThird Circuit· 2008-03-11· cited 57×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.