Christopher Brown v. John Calamos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing amendments to a complaint after a defendant has moved to dismiss under SLU-SA
• discussing amendments to a complaint after a defendant has moved to dismiss under SLUSA
• criticizing “cases that allow dismissal of a case barred by SLUSA without prejudice”
• court addressed whether the plaintiff's complaint alleged a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security
• SLUSA “prohib- its securities class actions if the class has more than 50 mem- bers”
• “But when SLUSA is a bar, it operates as an affirmative defense, which is a defense on the merits, not a jurisdictional defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).