Skip to main content
· 6/10/2016

Christopher Baine Thomas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the Board is entitled to enforcement of all unchallenged portions of its order, we summarily enforce all such provisions of the Board’s decision.” (cleaned up)
  • “Because the Board is entitled to enforcement of all unchallenged portions of its order, we summarily enforce all such provisions of the Board’s decision.” (cleaned up)
  • “the Board is entitled to enforcement of all unchallenged portions of its order”
  • “In assessing forfeiture under section 10(e) of the Act, ‘the critical question’ is ‘whether the Board received adequate notice of the basis for the objection.’” (quoting Alwin Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 192 F.3d 133, 143 (D.C. Cir. 1999))
  • reviewing authority to impose bargaining-costs remedy without awaiting compliance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.