· 10/27/2005
Christoff v. Union Pacific Railroad
Citations
- 36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 6
- 134 Cal. App. 4th 118
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 13501
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9885
- 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “the presence of railroad tracks is a warning of an open and obvious danger”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sims
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.