Christine Holt Spinelli v. Michael Gaughan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Mertens' holding that damages are not available under S 502(a)(3) applies toS 510 claims
• ruling that the Supremacy Clause permits Congress to preempt state legal claim without providing a jury trial
• recognizing that Mertens' holding that damages are not available under S 502(a)(3) applies toS 510 claims
• holding that an inconsistency between a treating physician’s 13 opinion and a claimant’s daily activities is a specific and legitimate reason to reject the 14 treating physician’s opinion
• recognizing that ERISA preempts a claim for retaliatory discharge under Nevada law
• recognizing that ERISA preempts a claim for retaliatory discharge under Nevada law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).