Christina Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of Elizabeth(074974)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in a multi-party case, \an order . . . dismissing all claims against one of several defendants is not a final order subject to appeal as of right\
• stating an order \clearly identified [in a] Case Information Statement submitted with [a] notice of appeal\ is deemed properly before the court for review
• stating an order \clearly identified [in a] [c]ase [i]nformation [s]tatement submitted with [a] [n]otice of [a]ppeal\ is deemed properly before the court for review
• stating an order \clearly identified [in a] Case Information Statement submitted with [a] Notice of Appeal\ is deemed properly before the court for review
• stating an order \clearly identified . . . in [a] Case Information Statement submitted with [a] Notice of Appeal\ is deemed properly before the court for review
• permitting review of an interlocutory agency decision not specifically indicated in the NOA because the CIS made clear that the appellant was challenging the interlocutory decision, and the respondent and the appellate panel had sufficient notice of the issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).