Christina Murphy Minadeo v. Ici Paints D/B/A the Glidden Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ADEA analysis is applicable to state-law claims brought pursuant to Ohio’s age-discrimination law
• holding that plaintiff failed to offer direct evidence where “[w]e could not possibly conclude that the comments and circumstances pointed to by [plaintiff] show a discriminatory motive on the part of [defendant] without drawing undue inferences”
• “ERISA disclosure requirements exist to help ensure that participants have access to information about their pension plans.”
• ADEA case law applies to Chapter 4112 age claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).