Christina J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court’s consideration of documents filed after trial was harmless error because other evidence supported the trial court’s findings of fact
• holding that the State’s efforts were active in their entirety despite three months of passive efforts out of thirteen total months of involvement
• holding that trial court should not have considered evidence of alleged arrest that was not admitted at termination trial
• holding consideration of arrest evidence not in record was harmless error because other admitted evidence supported finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).