Christie's Inc. v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that any questions about the reasonableness of the eventual sale of the collateral were premature in the note litigation, but could be raised after the property is sold in “a separate lawsuit to challenge the commercial reasonableness of that sale”
• noting that “‘mere conjecture [and] speculation,’ . . . does not provide a basis to deny summary judgment”
• noting that “‘mere conjecture [and] speculation,’ . . . does not provide a basis to deny summary judgment” (quoting Argus Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 801 F.3d 38, 42 (2d Cir. 1986) (first alteration in original))
• under a note and security agreement, plaintiff was permitted to satisfy its debt by foreclosing on certain collateral

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).