Christie v. Rolscreen Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the “most significant relationship” test applies to tort causes of action, citing Zeman v. Canton State Bank, 211 N.W.2d 346, 349 (Iowa 1973)
• recognizing that the “most significant relationship” test applies to tort causes of action, citing Zeman v. Canton State Bank, 211 N.W.2d 346, 349 (Iowa 1973)
• recognizing that the “most significant relationship” test applies to tort causes of action
• recognizing Zeman as controlling on this issue, but finding it unnecessary to decide this issue in the appeal before it
• noting “we have referred to ‘lack of authority to hear the particular case’ as lack of jurisdiction of the case”
• \Sometimes we have referred to `lack of authority to hear the particular case' as lack of jurisdiction of the case.\ (Citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).