Christian v. Virginia Department of Social Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant had sufficiently identified VDSS as a party in his petition for appeal to the circuit court despite his failure to name VDSS as a party
• “Through the use of administrative hearing officers, VDSS reviews de novo any contested determination by a local department.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).