Christian v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is inappropriate to permit a plaintiff “to pursue a takings remedy in order to circumvent the limitations inherent in its contractual relationship with the Government.”
• noting that it is inappropriate to permit a plaintiff “to pursue a takings remedy in order to circumvent the limitations inherent in its contractual relationship with the Government”
• noting it is inappropriate to permit plaintiff “to pursue a takings remedy in order to circumvent the limitations inherent in its contractual relationship with the Government”
• noting it is inappropriate to permit a plaintiff “to pursue a takings remedy in order to circumvent the limitations inherent in its contractual relationship with the Government”
• “A more fully developed record will allow the court to assess whether the property right implicated in plaintiffs takings claim falls outside the rights granted under the Standard Contract.”
• “[T]he court views plaintiffs takings theory as an alternative to its contract claim ..., and not as a mechanism by which plaintiff may obtain remedies unavailable to it under the Standard Contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).