Skip to main content

Christian v. Scott

Citations

  • 1 Stew. 490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “broad language” of Subsection 1491(b) demonstrated “Congress’s expressed intent that the Subsection encompass the entire procurement process”
  • holding that the “broad language” of Subsection 1491(b) demonstrated “Congress’s expressed intent that the Subsection encompass the entire procurement process”
  • ruling on the Government’s motion to dismiss without a complete Administrative Record
  • clarifying lhat an action that objects to the solicitation is properly brought as a pre-award protest
  • ordering the government to file the administrative record pursuant to RCFC Appendix C, ¶¶ 21-24
  • addressing other circumstances in which the so-called “third category” of the court’s bid-protest jurisdiction comes into play; challenges to pre-award and post-award procurement actions by federal agencies constitute the first two categories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crenshaw, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.