Christian v. Biden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \Justice Kennedy's proposition that strict scrutiny is 'unlikely' to apply to race[-]conscious measures that do not lead to treatment based on classification does not 'explain[] the result' of [Parents Involved]\
• analyzing intentional discrimination outside of the Title VII employment context under the Equal Protection Clause
• “Racially discriminatory purpose means that the decisionmaker adopted the challenged action at least partially because the action would benefit or burden an identifiable group.”
• “[r]acially discriminatory purpose means that the decisionmaker adopted the challenged action at least partially because the action would benefit or burden an identifiable group”
• “The Court has never held that strict scrutiny should be applied to a school plan in which race is not a factor merely because the decisionmakers were aware of or considered race when adopting the policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).