Christian Legal Society v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “[t]here can be little doubt that requiring CLS to [alter its membership standards] would impair its ability to express disapproval of active homosexuality”
• “It goes without saying that a group must engage in expressive association in order to avail itself of the First Amendment’s protections for expressive association”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).