Christian Kreipke v. Wayne State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that WSU is an arm of the State and not subject to liability under the False Claims Act by applying the same arm-of- state analysis used for purposes of Eleventh Amendment immunity
• noting that a complaint should “contain either direct or inferential allegations respecting all material elements necessary for recovery under a viable legal theory” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that a complaint should “contain either direct or inferential allegations respecting all material elements necessary for recovery under a viable legal theory” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• relying on state statute that required “any judgment against [Wayne State University] to be paid out of the state’s tax revenues''
• collecting cases holding that Wayne State University is an arm of the state for purposes of Eleventh Amendment immunity
• remaining three factors in arm-of-state test favored finding that Wayne State was an arm of the state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).