Skip to main content
· 9/8/2003

Christian J. Jansen, Jr. v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.

Citations

  • 342 F.3d 1329
  • 68 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1154
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that amendments made to gain allowance must be given weight
  • reading together phrases that were added simultaneously to overcome the same rejection by the Examiner
  • explaining claim construction begins with the plain meaning of the patent language
  • the preamble is a statement of the purpose of the inven- tion
  • “In this case, the [claim phrases at issue] were added to gain allowance of the claims. . . . We must therefore give them weight, for the patentability of the claims hinged upon their presence in the claim language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Rader, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.