Skip to main content
· 1/13/2010

Christian Action Network v. Maine

Citations

  • 679 F. Supp. 2d 140
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2920
  • 2010 WL 125967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the First Circuit has not clearly stated “any pleading or burden requirements” in the context of abstention and choosing not to apply either Rule 12(b)(1) or Rule 12(b)(6
  • “Extraordinary circumstances include bad faith, harassment and extreme bias; great and immediate irreparable harm to core constitutional values . . .”
  • “Because abstention is involved, I do not consider myself limited to the facts that the plaintiff pleaded to determine whether comity and federalism counsel against my exercise of jurisdiction, and I do not rely upon the pleading or burden requirements of either Rule 12(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: D. Brock Hornby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.