Christensen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a probation condition requiring residential treatment if recommended by a substance abuse evaluation was illegal because it failed to set a maximum period for such treatment
• \[A]n illegal sentence should not be increased unless absolutely necessary to correct the illegality.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grinols v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-10-13· cited 46×
• Cathcart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-09· cited 18×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-03-31· cited 10×
• Jose Alfredo Galindo v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-01-29· cited 9×
• Grant v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2016-08-19· cited 6×
• Twogood v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-11-21· cited 2×
• Byford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2015-06-26· cited 2×
• Silas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-06-01· cited 1×
• Osborne v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-05-16
• Rafael Lopez Martinez v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-05-19

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. LaPorte
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-11-18· cited 21×
• Joseph v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-01-31· cited 14×
• Love v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1990-10-26· cited 14×
• Curtis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-05-15· cited 11×
• Figueroa v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-10-19· cited 10×
• Dunham v. City and Borough of Juneau
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1990-04-13· cited 9×