Christensen v. Christgard, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that broad clause covering any claim did not cover only third-party claims
• recognizing that an indemnification clause can cover both first- and third-party claims
• considering extrinsic evidence parties presented regarding meaning of indemnity clause and holding that broad clause covering any claim did not cover only third-party claims
• affirming the award of nearly half a million less than the party’s calculated damages because the jury could have concluded that though the project at issue was “very likely to occur, it was not a certainty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).