Christen v. Groff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a market maker is atypical of the class because “issues of both reliance and materiality would be different for a market maker”
• finding that purported class representative’s potential reliance on oral misrepresentations by the defendant was a unique defense rendering action unsuitable for class certification
• finding that purported class representative’s potential reliance on oral misrepresentations by the defendant was a unique defense rendering action unsuitable for class certification
• on remand, denying class certification of fraud-on-the-market claim involving security not openly traded
• on remand, denying class certification of fraud-on-the-market claim involving security not openly traded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).