Christ v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding city could not be held liable for inverse condemnation based upon an alleged failure to prospectively maintain or inspect the sewers
• finding MSD could not be held liable for inverse condemnation for issues based upon an alleged failure to prospectively maintain or inspect the sewers
• “Injury, damage, and causation are essential elements required for recovery on the basis of nuisance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).