Skip to main content
· 3/2/1900

Christ v. Garretson State Bank

Citations

  • 13 S.D. 23
  • 82 N.W. 89
  • 1900 S.D. LEXIS 93

Syllabus

<p>1. A finding of a trial court will not bo disturbed lor insufficiency of evidence unless there is a olear preponderance of evidence against it.-</p> <p>2. Where, in a case tried without a jury, the issue, was whether defendant had purchased a certain note believing he was dealing with plaintiffs authorized agent, testimony as to what the agent said at the time of negotiating the note, while nor evidence of the agent’s authority, was admissible to show the purchase and good faith of defendant.</p> <p>3. On a trial 1o the court it will not. be presumed the court considered evidence for any other than the purpose for which it was properly admitted.</p>

Judges: Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.