Chrisman v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Tohono “declined to either overrule or explicitly endorse Tecon’s order-of-filing rale, and it did not indicate otherwise that Tecon is no longer good law”
• treating both complaints as simultaneously filed “where it is not possible to determine the exact sequence of filing”
• “The Tohono Court, however, declined to either overrule or explicitly endorse Tecon’s order-of-filing rule, and it did not indicate otherwise that Tecon is no longer good law.”
• “The Tohono Court, however, declined to either overrule or explicitly endorse Tecon’s order-of-filing rule, and it did not indicate otherwise that Tecon is no longer good law.”
• “The Tohono Court, however, declined to either overrule or explicitly endorse Tecon’s order-of-filing rule, and it did not indicate otherwise that Tecon is no longer good law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).