Skip to main content
· 12/21/1990

Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 800 S.W.2d 717
  • 304 Ark. 227
  • 1990 Ark. LEXIS 618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that state law governs the award of attorney fees in a diversity action
  • finding “may” in Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22- 308 is permissive and subject to trial court’s discretion
  • noting that the following factors are relevant in determining reasonable attorney’s fees: (1) the experience and ability of the attorney; (2) the time and labor required to perform the service properly; (3) the amount in controversy and the result obtained in the case; (4
  • considering argument from counsel and holding that “we [were] persuaded [that] the trial court considered the pertinent facts in arriving at its 118award of $25,000.” Id. at 230, 800 S.W.2d at 719
  • utilizing a similar multi-factor test in considering whether to award attorneys’ fees
  • trial courts should be guided by recognized factors in determining attorney's fees and such fees will not be set aside absent an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.