· 7/23/2015
Chris Schaffhauser v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Citations
- 794 F.3d 899
- 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1437
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12673
- 127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1292
- 2015 WL 4477239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that a plaintiff can show pretext by showing an employer failed to follow its own policies
- holding pretext in a Title VII case may be established by showing that similarly situated employees were treated more leniently than Plaintiff
- holding the defendant employer’s failure to follow its own personnel policies, without evidence of discriminatory animus, did not establish discrimination
- explaining that a disabled employee \must alert his employer to the need for an accommodation and provide relevant details of his disability\
- determining that the analysis for discrimination claims is the same under Title VII, § 1981, and the ACRA
- noting that courts using the same standard to evaluate disability claims brought under the ADA and the ACRA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gruender, Melloy, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.