Skip to main content
· 7/23/2015

Chris Schaffhauser v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 794 F.3d 899
  • 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1437
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12673
  • 127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1292
  • 2015 WL 4477239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a plaintiff can show pretext by showing an employer failed to follow its own policies
  • holding pretext in a Title VII case may be established by showing that similarly situated employees were treated more leniently than Plaintiff
  • holding the defendant employer’s failure to follow its own personnel policies, without evidence of discriminatory animus, did not establish discrimination
  • explaining that a disabled employee \must alert his employer to the need for an accommodation and provide relevant details of his disability\
  • determining that the analysis for discrimination claims is the same under Title VII, § 1981, and the ACRA
  • noting that courts using the same standard to evaluate disability claims brought under the ADA and the ACRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gruender, Melloy, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.