Chris Paradissiotis v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting 10 a takings clause claim that OFAC’s freezing of the plaintiff’s 11 stock options, which eventually became valueless, constituted a 12 taking without just compensation
• \[V]alid regulatory measures taken to serve substantial national security interests ... have not been recognized as compensable takings for Fifth Amendment purposes.\
• “The fact that his risk-taking turned out badly for him does not render it a taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).