Chris Falcone, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]ppellant did not properly transfer its federal case simply by filing a new complaint in state court”
• affirming dismissal of state action transferred ten months after federal dismissal for lack of jurisdiction
• rejecting ten-month delay between initial filing with state court and compliance with Section 5103(b)
• “Appellant did not properly transfer its federal case simply by filing a new complaint in state court.”
• “Prejudice is not the controlling concern in this circumstance. The key . . . is conformity with the statutory requirements, which are not onerous in light of the protection the statute affords.”
• appellant belatedly transferred the “certified record” from federal court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).