Skip to main content
INND· 11/18/1983

Chrapliwy v. Uniroyal, Inc.

Citations

  • 583 F. Supp. 40
  • 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 571
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11534
  • 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a 20% reduction in compensable hours appropriate to “eliminate the possibility of duplication or unreasonable hours, as well as resolve the ambiguities arising from [the plaintiff’s] inadequate records”
  • “A day with 10 billable hours, while extraordinary, will occasionally occur. But 17 days where billable hours equaled or exceeded 12 hours is not justifiable. A 20 hour day is questionable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.