INND· 11/18/1983
Chrapliwy v. Uniroyal, Inc.
Citations
- 583 F. Supp. 40
- 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 571
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11534
- 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,990
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a 20% reduction in compensable hours appropriate to “eliminate the possibility of duplication or unreasonable hours, as well as resolve the ambiguities arising from [the plaintiff’s] inadequate records”
- “A day with 10 billable hours, while extraordinary, will occasionally occur. But 17 days where billable hours equaled or exceeded 12 hours is not justifiable. A 20 hour day is questionable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.