Choup v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding that “Section 1961’s terms do not permit of the exercise of judicial discretion in its application”
• holding that when a party moves under Rule 59(e) for correction of an altered judgment, timeliness “is determined from the date of the amended judgment . . . if the motion bears some relationship to the district court’s alteration of the first judgment”
• allowing a Rule 59(e) motion after an amended judgment “only if the motion bears some relationship to the district court’s alteration of the first judgment”
• under Section 1961, the award of post-judgment interest is mandatory on awards in civil cases
• under Section 1961, the award of post-judgment interest is mandatory on awards in civil cases
• “The award of post-judgment interest is mandatory on awards in civil cases as of the date judgment is entered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).