Choplosky v. Choplosky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while modification of custody orders may be entertained at any time in order to promote the best interests of the child, general notice requirements must be strictly observed
• holding that while modification of custody orders may be entertained at any time in order to promote the best interests of the child, general notice requirements must be strictly observed
• holding that while modification of custody orders may be entertained at any time in order to promote the best interests of the child, general notice requirements must be strictly observed
• explaining that the trial court erred by permanently modifying custody following a contempt hearing, but suggesting that a temporary modification may be permissible
• “without a motion to modify visitation rights before it, a trial court may not permanently alter the visitation rights of [the] parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).