Choon Poong Lee v. Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Corps satisfied NEPA by preparing a project-specific EIS within an area that already had an area-wide EIS
• “Only the effects caused by” the “discharge into U.S. waters” is “relevant under NEPA.”
• “[R]egulations cannot contradict their animating statutes or manufacture additional agency power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).